Apply previous Checkpoint #2 and #3 feedback on Annotated Bibliography entries
Argument AGAINST a scholarly article: minimum of 200 words
What is the article's argument?
Why do you disagree?
What evidence from the text(s) support your reading?
Review classmates' pages/Bonus: post Discussion Posts with constructive comments and suggestions
Requirement
Points
Meeting with Dr. T (Optional)
5
Abstract of Journal Article
25
Annotated Bibliography entry #7
10
Annotated Bibliography entry #8
10
Annotated Bibliography entry #9
10
Argument against a scholarly article
20
Bonus
Discussion Posts with constructive comments and suggestions on at least two (different from Checkpoint 3) classmates' pages
Up to 5
Suggestions between Checkpoints
Bonus: Create an outline of Journal Article (upload to your page)
Revisit library for more research assistance: you may turn in another Library Visit Form (may earn 5-point bonus for one additional Form during semester )
Show a rough draft to Dr. T and your research group (suggested: at least a week before due)
Due: November 29
Checkpoint outcomes: Students will be able to…
- articulate connections between sources and relate them to the research question or topic;
- willingly offer arguments opposing an authoritative source; and
- identify and analyze assumptions and/or bias in sources.
Requirements:Suggestions between Checkpoints